EQA/PT scheme to improve the equivalence of enzymatic results between mutual recognition laboratories in Beijing.

BACKGROUND: To utilize the external quality assessment (EQA)/proficiency testing (PT) scheme to evaluate the equivalence of different clinical enzymatic measuring systems in Beijing. METHODS: The Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratory (BCCL) distributed three investigation samples to mutual recognition clinical laboratories in Beijing including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), creatine kinase (CK), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). These samples were derived from serum pools with values assigned by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) enzymatic reference measurement procedures (RMPs). Each laboratory performed duplicate tests of the samples. Then, the samples at level 1 were used to recalibrate individual measuring systems for repeating the tests. BCCL collected data for evaluation of their analytical quality. RESULTS: Before recalibration, the biases of ALT and AST tests were not traceable to the IFCC RMPs, and the bias pass rates of GGT, CK, and LDH tests were only 51.2%, 55.7%, and 48.6% respectively. After recalibration, the pass rates of ALT, AST, GGT, CK, and LDH increased to 95.1%, 82.9%, 95.1%, 97.1%, and 70.0% respectively. The EQA/PT also showed that after recalibration, more than 95% of laboratories met the optimum level specifications of the biological variation for ALT, AST, GGT, and CK tests and the desirable for LDH tests. CONCLUSION: The enzymatic tests in Beijing need to be further standardized by category 1 or 2 EQA/PT scheme for mutual recognition between clinical laboratories. The criteria of biological variation are more relevant for determining the equivalence of clinical enzymatic tests.

Preparation, stability and commutability of candidate reference materials for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH).

BACKGROUND: Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a key enzyme that functions as a marker of cell damage. Its activity can be measured by a variety of laboratory methods. To eliminate inter-method bias and enhance equivalence among different measurement procedures, LDH detection needs to be standardized. METHODS: Optimized sequences coding for lactate dehydrogenase subunit A (LDH-A) and subunit B (LDH-B) were synthesized and cloned into the pRSFDuet vector, and then the constructed 6His-LDHA-pRSFDuet, 6His-LDHB-pRSFDuet, and 6His-LDHA-LDHB-pRSFDuet plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) for expression. The enzyme activity and specific activity of recombinant LDHs were detected. Electrophoresis of LDH isoenzymes was performed. The stability of recombinant LDHs and serum LDH was evaluated. Commutability of recombinant LDH-B was studied by the IFCC reference method and six routine methods. RESULTS: Three plasmids were constructed and three highly concentrated recombinant LDH isoenzymes were obtained. The specific activities of LDH-A, LDH-AB, and LDH-B were 18.08 U/mg, 21.74 U/mg, and 14.18 U/mg, respectively. There was a desirable linear correlation between the activities of recombinant LDH isoenzymes and their protein concentrations. Electrophoresis of LDH isoenzymes showed that the recombinant LDH-B corresponded to LDH1 and it demonstrated good stability at 4 °C and 25 °C for 5 weeks. LDH-B formulations in saline-bovine serum albumin solution and human serum matrix were commutable for six routine methods. CONCLUSION: Human recombinant LDH-B has great potential to become an improved and less expensive standard or reference material in external quality assessment for clinical LDH measurement.

Directrices de Laboratorio para la Detección y el Diagnóstico de la Infección con el Virus COVID-19 / Laboratory Guidelines for the Detection and Diagnosis of COVID-19 Virus Infection

Los coronavirus son un grupo de virus ARN altamente diversos de la familia Coronaviridae que se dividen en 4 géneros: alfa, beta, gamma y delta, y que causan enfermedades de leves a graves en humanos y animales (1-3). Existen coronavirus humanos endémicos como los alfacoronavirus 229E y NL63 y los betacoronavirus OC43 y HKU1 que pueden causar enfermedades de tipo influenza o neumonía en humanos (1, 3). Sin embargo, dos coronavirus zoonóticos que causan enfermedades graves en humanos han emergido: el coronavirus del Síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV) en 2002-2003 y el coronavirus del Síndrome respiratorio de Oriente Medio (MERS-CoV) (1-5). En enero de 2020, el agente etiológico responsable de un grupo de casos de neumonía grave en Wuhan, China, fue identificado como un nuevo betacoronavirus, distinto del SARS-CoV y MERS-CoV (6). El 11 de febrero de 2020, el Comité Internacional de Taxonomía de Virus (ICTV) anunció la denominación del virus como coronavirus del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (7), mientras que, el mismo día, la OMS nombró la enfermedad como enfermedad por coronavirus COVID-19 (8). Para fines de comunicación, haremos referencia a este virus como "el virus responsable de COVID-19" o "el virus COVID-19". La secuencia genómica completa de este nuevo agente está disponible y se han desarrollado diferentes protocolos de detección (9). A la luz de la circulación actual de COVID-19 en la región de las Américas, la Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Organización Mundial de la Salud (OPS / OMS) recomienda a los Estados Miembros garantizar la identificación oportuna de casos sospechosos, la toma y el envío de muestras a los laboratorios de referencia, y la implementación de protocolos de detección molecular, según la capacidad del laboratorio.

Exploring Leishmania infantum cathepsin as a new molecular marker for phylogenetic relationships and visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Leishmania infantum, the etiological agent of visceral leishmaniasis, is a neglected zoonosis that requires validation and standardization of satisfactory diagnostic methodologies. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cathepsin L-like protease as a target for making molecular diagnoses and as a phylogenetic marker enabling to understand the intraspecies variations and evolutionary history of L. infantum in Brazil. METHODS: We used 44 isolates of L. infantum. The cathepsin L-like gene fragments were amplified, sequenced, manually aligned and analyzed using inference methods. The sequences generated were used to search and design oligonucleotide primers to be used in reactions specific to the target parasite. RESULTS: The cathepsin L-like gene did not show any intraspecies variability among the isolates analyzed. The pair of primers proposed amplified the target deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of L. infantum isolates and were effective for DNA amplification at concentrations of as low as 10- 11 ng/µl. The proposed marker did not present cross-reactions with other hemoparasites. When used for making the diagnosis in a panel of clinical samples from dogs, a positivity rate of 49.03% (102/208) was obtained, versus 14.42% (30/208) for a ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) marker. In samples from sandflies, the rate was 6.25% and from humans, 14.28%. CONCLUSIONS: The results described in this work allow us to infer that CatLeish-PCR is a sensitive and specific marker for use in diagnostic trials of L. infantum and in clinical and epidemiological surveys.

Systematic review on recent potential biomarkers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and associated with decreased lung function and inflammation. The heterogeneity of COPD and its molecular and clinical features hinder efficient patient stratification and introduction of personalized therapeutic approaches. The available clinical tools do not efficiently predict the progression and exacerbations of the disease. Areas covered: An overview of the most recent studies on putative COPD protein biomarkers and the challenges for implementing their use in the clinical setting is presented. Expert commentary: Proteomics biomarker discovery in COPD has mostly focused on approaches evaluating specific proteins on a limited number of samples. The most promising protein candidates can be classified into five main biological categories: extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, inflammation/immune response, oxidative stress response, vascular tone regulation, and lipid metabolism. To efficiently stratify COPD patients and predict exacerbations, it will be necessary to implement biomarker panels to better represent the complex pathophysiology of this disease. The application of unbiased proteomics and bioinformatics followed by appropriate clinical validation studies will contribute to the achievement of this aim while increasing the number of validated biomarkers that can enter the qualification processes by the regulatory entities.

Recent advances in histone modification and histone modifying enzyme assays.

Introduction: Histone modifying enzymes (HMEs)-catalyzed histone modifications are important epigenetic markers that play critical roles in the regulation of a variety of cellular functions, especially the regulation of gene expression. The aberrant histone modifying enzyme activity and the abnormal histone modification level are closely associated with various human diseases including cancers, making them become the promising and attractive disease biomarkers. Consequently, the development of efficient assays for accurate and sensitive detection of histone modifications and HMEs are crucial for disease diagnosis. Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the advances in histone modifications and HMEs assays in recent 5 years (2013-2018), including the development of various methods based on fluorescent, bioluminescent, colorimetric, electrochemical, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, and mass spectrometry strategies. Their principles and applications for in vitro and in vivo assays are reviewed, and the future directions are discussed as well. Expert commentary: In comparison with the conventional radioactive and Western blot assays, the newly developed histone modifications and HMEs assays exhibit distinct advantages. Especially, the introduction of novel nanomaterials and advanced analytical techniques in recent years has greatly improved the assay performances, promoting their further applications in biomedical research and clinical diagnosis.

Evaluation of a Novel Quantitative Test for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: Bringing Quantitative Testing for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency Closer to the Patient.

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, a common genetic blood condition, can result in kernicterus at birth, and later in life as severe hemolysis on exposure to certain infections, foods, and drugs. The unavailability of point-of-care tests for G6PD deficiency is a barrier to routine curative treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria with 8-aminoquinolines, such as primaquine. Two quantitative reference tests (Trinity Biotech, Bray, Ireland and Pointe Scientific, Canton, MI; Cat No. G7583) and the point-of-care STANDARD™ G6PD test (SD Biosensor, Suwon, South Korea) were evaluated. The STANDARD G6PD test was evaluated at multiple temperatures, in anticoagulated venous and capillary samples, including 79 G6PD-deficient and 66 intermediate samples and across two laboratories, one in the United States and one in Thailand. The STANDARD test performed equivalently to a reference assay for its ability to diagnose G6PD deficiency (< 30% normal) with a sensitivity of 100% (0.95 confidence interval [CI]: 95.7-100) and specificity of 97% (0.95 CI: 94.5-98.5), and could reliably identify females with less than 70% normal G6PD activity with a sensitivity of 95.5% (0.95 CI: 89.7-98.5) and specificity of 97% (0.95 CI: 94.5-98.6). The STANDARD G6PD product represents an opportunity to diagnose G6PD deficiency equally for males and females in basic clinical laboratories in high- and low-resource settings. This quantitative point-of-care diagnostic test for G6PD deficiency can provide equal access to safe radical cure of P. vivax cases in high- and low-resource settings, for males and females and may support malaria elimination, in countries where P. vivax is endemic.

Evaluation of the accuracy of "ChE check mobile" in measurement of acetylcholinesterase in pesticide poisoning.

BACKGROUND: Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) are used in clinical management to confirm the diagnosis and indicate the severity of organophosphorus and carbamate poisoning. ChE check mobile is a new portable cholinesterase testing system developed in Germany. The study aims to evaluate the accuracy of ChE check mobile compared to the standard reference method and Test-mate ChE system. METHODS: Patients with organophosphorus and carbamate poisoning were recruited from two general hospitals in Sri Lanka between September 2013 and November 2014. The AChE was measured using the three methods. RESULTS: Blood samples were collected from 185 self-poisoned patients (170 organophosphorus and 15 carbamate) and 20 normal individuals. ChE check mobile correlated well with spectrophotometer readings (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.87) but gave higher values (Mean bias for AChE: +6.55 (95% CI: -11 to 24) U/g Hb). A similar positive bias from Test-mate results was also observed. Applying a correction factor derived from the volunteer samples (dividing by 1.353) greatly improved agreement in pesticide poisoned patients. CONCLUSIONS: ChE check mobile system allowed for rapid determination of AChE activity but gave somewhat higher AChE compared to other methods. Applying a correction factor of 1.353 provide a good agreement to both reference and Test-mate ChE machine in this setting.

Spectrophotometry assays to determine G6PD activity from Trinity Biotech and Pointe Scientific G6PD show good correlation.

OBJECTIVES: Spectrophotometry kits from Pointe Scientific (PS; USA) were compared to kits from Trinity Biotech (Trinity; Ireland) in 50 venous blood samples from purposively selected individuals in Bangladesh. Repeatability and inter-assay variability were assessed by Students t-test, Bland-Altman plot and Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The median glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity of all G6PD normal participants was calculated per assay and defined as 100% activity. Performance was calculated considering 30% and 70% cut off activities and Trinity as reference. RESULTS: The intra-assay correlation of Trinity (r = 0.9841, p < 0.001) and PS (r = 0.9833, p < 0.001) did not differ significantly (p = 0.904). Both assays were closely correlated (r = 0.9799, p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 0.1 U/gHb (95% limit of agreement: - 1.32 to 1.57). At 30% cut off PS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (95 CI) 59.0-100.0) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 91.8 to 100.0), at 70% cut-off of 100% (95% CI 79.4-100.0) and 97.1% (95% CI 84.7-99.9) respectively. The G6PD assay from PS is a reliable alternative to the assay from Trinity.

Evaluation of serum alkaline phosphatase measurement through the 4-year trueness verification program in China.

Background Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is critical for various diseases. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine had recommended the new reference procedure in 2011, but many manufacturers did not trace results to the higher procedure. Since 2012, the National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) in China has organized the trueness verification program (TV) with commutable materials. The present study summarizes the 4-year TV program to give an overview of the measurement standardization for ALP results. Methods Commutable serum-based materials with different concentrations were prepared and sent to participating laboratories. The target values were assigned by the reference lab network. Results The analytical performance was evaluated according to three indexes: trueness (bias), imprecision (CV) and accuracy (total error [TE]). The number of participating laboratories increased from 115 in 2012 to 287 in 2016. The pass rates of precision for homogeneous and heterogeneous systems were all above 85% over the 4 years; however, the pass rates of bias were much lower (<50%). Among the homogeneous systems, Roche Cobas/Modular had an obvious negative bias, whereas the mean positive bias for Beckman AU was prominent. As to the heterogeneous systems, the pass rates of bias for Sichuan Maccura (57.1%-78.6%) were higher than Roche Cobas/Modular (4.4%-33.9%) and Beckman AU (35.7%-64.8%). Conclusions The PT/EQA program with commutable materials can be used to assess the trueness against target values assigned by reference procedures. For ALP, homogeneous systems did not perform better than heterogeneous systems. The bias for ALP performance was notable and was the main obstacle to its standardization in China.

Amylase in drain fluid for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in post-pancreatic resection.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of people with clinically significant postoperative pancreatic leaks is different from those without clinically significant pancreatic leaks. It is important to know the diagnostic accuracy of drain fluid amylase as a triage test for the detection of clinically significant pancreatic leaks, so that an informed decision can be made as to whether the patient with a suspected pancreatic leak needs further investigations and treatment. There is currently no systematic review of the diagnostic test accuracy of drain fluid amylase for the diagnosis of clinically relevant pancreatic leak. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of amylase in drain fluid at 48 hours or more for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in people who had undergone pancreatic resection. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index Expanded, and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) websites up to 20 February 2017. We searched the references of the included studies to identify additional studies. We did not restrict studies based on language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively. We also performed a 'related search' and 'citing reference' search in MEDLINE and Embase. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all studies that evaluated the diagnostic test accuracy of amylase in the drain fluid at 48 hours or more for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in people who had undergone pancreatic resection excluding total pancreatectomy. We planned to exclude case-control studies because these studies are prone to bias, but did not find any. At least two authors independently searched and screened the references produced by the search to identify relevant studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies. The included studies reported drain fluid amylase on different postoperative days and measured at different cut-off levels, so it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis using the bivariate model as planned. We have reported the sensitivity, specificity, post-test probability of a positive and negative drain fluid amylase along with 95% confidence interval (CI) on each of the different postoperative days and measured at different cut-off levels. MAIN RESULTS: A total of five studies including 868 participants met the inclusion criteria for this review. The five studies included in this review reported the value of drain fluid amylase at different thresholds and different postoperative days. The sensitivities and specificities were variable; the sensitivities ranged between 0.72 and 1.00 while the specificities ranged between 0.73 and 0.99 for different thresholds on different postoperative days. At the median prevalence (pre-test probability) of 15.9%, the post-test probabilities for pancreatic leak ranged between 35.9% and 95.4% for a positive drain fluid amylase test and ranged between 0% and 5.5% for a negative drain fluid amylase test.None of the studies used the reference standard of confirmation by surgery or by a combination of surgery and clinical follow-up, but used the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) grade B and C as the reference standard. The overall methodological quality was unclear or high in all the studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Because of the paucity of data and methodological deficiencies in the studies, we are uncertain whether drain fluid amylase should be used as a method for testing for pancreatic leak in an unselected population after pancreatic resection; and we judge that the optimal cut-off of drain fluid amylase for making the diagnosis of pancreatic leak is also not clear. Further well-designed diagnostic test accuracy studies with pre-specified index test threshold of drain fluid amylase (at three times more on postoperative day 5 or another suitable pre-specified threshold), appropriate follow-up (for at least six to eight weeks to ensure that there are no pancreatic leaks), and clearly defined reference standards (of surgical, clinical, and radiological confirmation of pancreatic leak) are important to reliably determine the diagnostic accuracy of drain fluid amylase in the diagnosis of pancreatic leak.

Progress and impact of enzyme measurement standardization.

International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) has established reference measurement procedures (RMPs) for the most popular enzymes. Manufacturers should assign values to commercial calibrators traceable to these RMPs to achieve equivalent results in clinical samples, independent of reagent kits, instruments, and laboratory where the measurement is carried out. The situation is, however, far from acceptable. Some manufacturers continue to market assays giving results that are not traceable to internationally accepted RMPs. Meanwhile, end-users often do not abandon assays with demonstrated insufficient quality. Of the enzyme measurements, creatine kinase (CK) is satisfactorily standardized and a substantial improvement in performance of marketed γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) assays has been demonstrated. Conversely, aminotransferase measurements often exceed the desirable analytical performance because of the lack of pyridoxal-5-phosphate addition in the commercial reagents. Measurements of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and α-amylase (AMY) still show major disagreement, suggesting the need for improvement in implementing traceability to higher-order references. This is mainly the result of using assays with different analytical selectivities for these enzymes. The definition by laboratory professionals of the clinically acceptable measurement uncertainty for each enzyme together with the adoption by EQAS of commutable materials and use of an evaluation approach based on trueness represent the way forward for reaching standardization in clinical enzymology.

Evaluation of serum bone alkaline phosphatase activity in patients with liver disease: Comparison between electrophoresis and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Serum bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is a marker of bone formation and metabolism. However, existing methods for measuring it have their limitations and their accuracy has not been determined. METHODS: We measured serum bone ALP activity in 127 patients with liver disease using 2 methods: electrophoresis and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). The results of these 2 methods were compared and analyzed according to gender, age and several serum biochemical markers. RESULTS: When ALP3 (%; bone-type isozyme activity as a percentage of total ALP activity) values were high, the 2 methods showed good correlation. However, with a decrease in ALP3 (%) levels, the correlation coefficient (R) also decreased. Starting with ALP3 (%)<23, R values markedly decreased to <0.50 (p>0.05). Five outliers displayed low ALP3 (%) activity levels. Furthermore, in regard to genders, there were significant differences in total cholesterol (TC), γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GTP), ALP and ALP3 (%) levels (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When serum ALP3 (%) levels were high in patients with liver disease, the accuracy of electrophoresis was comparable to that of CLEIA. However, the accuracy of electrophoresis needs to be evaluated with further when patient samples under certain conditions.

What is the acceptable hemolysis index for the measurements of plasma potassium, LDH and AST?

Hemolysis is a cause of variability in test results for plasma potassium, LDH and AST and is a non-negligible part of measurement uncertainty. However, allowable levels of hemolysis provided by reagent suppliers take neither analytical variability (trueness and precision) nor the measurand into account. Using a calibration range of hemolysis, we measured the plasma concentrations of potassium, LDH and AST, and hemolysis indices with a Cobas C501 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics(®), Meylan, France). Based on the allowable total error (according to Ricós et al.) and the expanded measurement uncertainty equation we calculated the maximum allowable bias for two concentrations of each measurand. Finally, we determined the allowable hemolysis indices for all three measurands. We observed a linear relationship between the observed increases of concentration and hemolysis indices. The LDH measurement was the most sensitive to hemolysis, followed by AST and potassium measurements. The determination of the allowable hemolysis index depends on the targeted measurand, its concentration and the chosen level of requirement of allowable total error.

Establishing Reference Intervals of Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Platelet Ratio Index for Apparently Healthy Elderly.

BACKGROUND: Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI) serves as a parameter in evaluating liver fibrosis in current clinical practice. However, reference standard (reference intervals, RIs) or baseline levels of APRI have not been previously reported. The purpose of this paper is to establish the reference intervals of APRI in apparently healthy elderly people from the region of Shuyang, China. METHODS: Blood specimens were collected from local elderly residents (selected 51,263 elderly Han Shuyang Chinese from 65 to 97 years old, 32.97% males and 67.03% females) by standard procedures. Complete blood counts were determined by Sysmex XE-2100 analyzer and the AST values were measured by a TBA2000FR automatic biochemical analyzer (Toshiba Co., Ltd., Japan). The 95% reference intervals were calculated by using the non-parametric method according to the document: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline-Third Edition (C28-A3) of CLSI. RESULTS: RIs established for healthy elderly include: 0.1398-0.6266 for males and 0.1282-0.5798 for females (0.1284-0.5086 for 65-74 years old; 0.1209-0.5704 for > or = 75 years old). Ris of APRI for elderly males were higher than those of females, and values of APRI increased with increasing age for females. CONCLUSIONS: We established scientific and reasonable RIs of APRI for the healthy elderly in our region.

Development of reference intervals for serum alkaline phosphatase among adults in Southern China traced to the new IFCC reference measurement procedure.

BACKGROUND: Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) plays a critical role in the diagnosis of various diseases, and the establishment of relevant, reliable reference intervals (RI) is key to avoiding misdiagnoses. In 2011, IFCC published the new reference measurement procedure (RMP) for the determination of serum ALP in which one of the main modifications was the measuring temperature of the assay. Here, the new RMP was used to help establish RIs for serum ALP concentrations in healthy Chinese Han. METHODS: Volunteer individuals in Guangdong province, China (n=1622) were screened by questionnaire and laboratory testing for eligibility as a reference. Blood (20 mL) was collected and samples were measured by the Roche Modular system using the new RMP for the serum ALP compatible method. Partitioning of values by gender and/or age was evaluated with a standard normal deviate test after removing outliers. A simple non-parametric method for a two-sided 95% distribution of reference values was calculated. RESULTS: Serum ALP concentrations were obtained from the cohort of eligible reference individuals (n=658). The RI for serum ALP in males age 18-79 years was 48-131 U/L. Females were partitioned into two age groups based on statistical analysis, 18-49 years and 50-79 years, and the RIs derived were 40-106 U/L and 57-159 U/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RIs for serum ALP for Chinese Han individuals in between the ages of 18 and 79 years were determined and required partitioning due to the higher ALP values of females age 50-79 years.